A formal debate was held in the UK Parliament last week in response to two major e-petitions calling for tighter controls on fireworks, driven by widespread concern for animal welfare and public safety.
The petitions were brought forward by Redwings Campaign and Policy Manager Helen Whitelegg, who called for a reduction in the maximum noise level of consumer fireworks, and Robert Branch, who petitioned for a complete ban on the sale of fireworks to the general public. Both were present at Westminster for the debate.
Together, the two petitions have attracted more than 370,000 signatures, reflecting strong public support for reform. Many MPs attending the debate had been contacted directly by members of the public urging them to take action.
The first petition called for the maximum noise level of consumer fireworks to be reduced from 120 decibels to 90 decibels, citing thousands of reports of distress caused to pets and livestock. This petition received over 183,000 signatures. The second petition, which gained more than 193,000 signatures, called for a ban on the sale of fireworks to the general public in order to reduce harm caused by private, unregulated displays.
During the debate, MPs highlighted the significant animal welfare concerns associated with fireworks, particularly their impact on horses and livestock. The distress, injuries and risks caused by loud and unpredictable fireworks were acknowledged across the chamber.
However, no immediate changes to legislation were agreed. The current 120 decibel noise limit remains in place, and the sale of fireworks to the public continues to be permitted.
Despite the lack of immediate legal change, campaigners stress that the issue remains critically important. Horses and livestock can experience extreme fear, injury, escape incidents and, in some cases, death as a result of fireworks. Displays are not confined to specific dates and are often set off without warning, leaving owners to manage risks they have no control over.
While a parliamentary petition debate does not in itself change the law, it ensures the issue remains firmly on the political agenda. MPs from across the political spectrum expressed support for continued discussion, and campaigners emphasise that sustained public awareness and engagement will be essential in driving future change.